لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, it is also a nicely-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.
A survey of PACER buyers, conducted in 2021, measured user satisfaction and recognized areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office with the U.S. Courts is using the survey results To guage and prioritize future changes to PACER services and options.
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID required) to criminal and traffic case information in the general district courts with the purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.
long period petitioner was not deemed for promotion, meeting from the departmental promotion committee and think about the petitioner (Promotion)
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is usually a effectively-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.
be founded without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This can be a horrifying reality, an extremely low threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge into the Judgment within time. Read more
Section 302 from the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be topic for the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.
Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, in addition to case legislation at both the federal and state levels.
Performing a case regulation search may very well be as easy as entering specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain more info websites that facilitate case regulation searches, including:
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved Unless of course case is experimented with(Bail Matters)
13309-B of 2010 to get weak types of evidence as well as evidentiary value whereof would be seen with the time from the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, thus, confirmed custody on the petitioner in jail is unlikely to serve any helpful purpose at this stage.”
competent authority has determined the eligibility of your private respondents and found them to get fit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)